IDRS forum (TM)

Forum for students, teachers, professionals and aficionados of double reed instruments

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The IDRS Forum is open to the public. IDRS invites teachers, players, students, parents, enthusiasts and others interested in double reeds to come and enjoy the Forum!. Please read the Forum rules before you register. Revised Rules.

#1 2008-06-27 11:24:00

MarkN
New member
Registered: 2008-06-27
Posts: 3

Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

I currently play Oboe and EH and am interested in learning bassoon.  I am looking to purchase a new instrument, and have been considering the Fox Model III and the Fox Renard 220.  They seem to be pretty close in price if one adds the high-E key and the extra thumb rollers to the Model III to make the keywork equivalent to the 220.

I'm looking for general opinions of these two instruments, particularly comparing the polypropylene to the wood in terms of tone quality and potential problems.  Also, if I were to order a Model III, how important are other keywork options - particularly the left hand E-flat trill key, the thumb A-flat/B-flat trill key and the high-A bridge to the whisper key?  And what are the pros/cons of those extra thumb rollers that the 220 includes?

Thanks in advance for any advice/comments.

Mark

Offline

 

#2 2008-06-27 13:51:51

Bryan Cavitt
Member Associate
From: Elkhart, Indiana
Registered: 2006-08-11
Posts: 146

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

Mark -

A good question to ask!  The first person to ask is your teacher if you have one.  He may have definite opinions on this subject.  On Fox's website www.foxproducts.com they have a writeup in the parent/teacher resources sections on "The Virtues and Vices of Plastic Bassoons" - well worth reading.

I am currently playing on a Model III (thank you Gene Carter!) and gave my 240 to my son when he was accepted into music school.  I added the high E and high A bridge to my III and never regretted it.  I haven't come across any music since I bought my III 3-4 years ago that required me to need the trill keys, so I haven't missed them.  The right thumb rollers on my 240 I can't say I miss on my III.  The pros of having them would theoretically be quicker thumb action.  The cons would be that rollers make noise as you move across them.

Michael Dicker of Illinois State University and Fox Products plays on a model III that he has added a high resonance bell.  He does summers at Fox helping with repairs, so you might want to contact him there for a first hand opinion on that subject.

The main advantage to the Fox is that you have the flexibility to add whatever keywork you want and have the work done by Fox.  The 220 is essentially what you see is what you get.  If you want more keywork done you have to have it done by one of the many well qualified repair people that populates this list (as well as some that dont!).

Hope this helps somewhat...

Bryan Cavitt
Bassoonist, Elkhart (IN) Municipal Band; Bassoon Dad

Offline

 

#3 2008-06-27 14:43:55

deanie
Member Associate
From: Boston
Registered: 2007-06-04
Posts: 149
Website

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

Hi Mark,
   The main differences that you will notice will probably be the sound and the weight. The plastic weighs a bit more than the wood and never really developes the sound of a good wood bassoon, although the Fox plastic bassoons are sounding pretty damn good these days. The advantages of plastic bassoons are they are easier with upkeep, no worrying about rot, wood drying out, wood swelling, storage for extended periods without being played  etc. Its a big reason I tell school band directors to buy plastic. The differences in sound may bug players that are more advanced but I doubt that beginners and less advanced players will be bothered or notice the differences.
One problem with plastic is you need to make sure it doesn't get too cold. Plastic will expand and shrink a lot due to changes in temperature and if you keep it in the trunk of your car during a winter day you will find that all the keys are binding when you first take it out to play. They'll be fine once the bassoon warms up. I wouldn't worry too much about a high E or trill keys at this point.
Good luck with your choice and have fun.
Best
Jim Kirker

Offline

 

#4 2008-06-30 19:09:05

MarkN
New member
Registered: 2008-06-27
Posts: 3

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

Thanks for the helpful comments.  I have ordered a Model III with the Hi-E key and the Hi-A bridge to the whisper key.  How I just have to wait until the Fall for Fox to deliver it!

Mark

Offline

 

#5 2008-07-01 21:16:28

Trent
Premiere member
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: 2005-02-08
Posts: 602
Website

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

This might come as a bit of a weird suggestion if you haven't heard of this before, but get a wood bell for your plastic bassoon.  I mean the high resonance treated bells from Fox, so it'll fit your instrument.  They make the sound more like a wooden bassoon.  A colleague of mine played one a model III with the high resonance bell for several years before finally getting a 660 this past spring.  Michael Dicker, bassoon professor at Illinois State University in Bloomington, IL, played on this setup professionally for quite a few years.

You can get the bells in black finish if you want it to visibly match the rest of the instrument.

If you want to try it out, just find a friend with, I think it is Fox 201 (maybe a 601 bell will also fit, I'm not entirely sure) and try their bell if it has the high resonance treatment (all 201 and 601 models made after 2002 have this treatment).  You can ask Dr. Dicker which model it is that fits if there's even any difference.  You can contact him through his website: http://www.mddoublereed.com/

Have fun!

I just noticed that Bryan already mentioned this, but I gave a bit more detail, so I'm leaving my post.

Last edited by Trent (2008-07-01 21:17:39)


D.M.A. Candidate in Bassoon Performance - University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
"They are the perfect lamp quality bassoon as their appearance is excellent for that purpose and they don't play well enough for any other." -- Chip Owen

Offline

 

#6 2008-07-02 18:15:02

Bssntech
Member Associate
From: Ottawa, Illinois
Registered: 2006-08-07
Posts: 148

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

Hi All:



       If you are going to pur resonance bell on a model 3 a 601 or 660 bell will not work as the outside diameter is much thicker (hence thick wall horns) the bll to be tried would have to come from a model 101, 201, 1, or 2.

       I was a student of Michael Dicker's when he bought the Model 3 with the wooden bell. Not a bad horn, but I will say that from the Model 3 he has since went to a Renard 220 that he play for a while and has recently been playing a 240. I spoke with him in December at the Midwest clinic in Chicago and he told me he recently ordered a 201. I figured that this may be of interest as you debate you decision.


                                                                 Best Regards,
                                                                  Chad Taylor


Taylor Bassoon Services
723 Steamboat Ct
Ottawa, IL 61350
PH-815-343-2492

Offline

 

#7 2008-07-03 19:38:04

deanie
Member Associate
From: Boston
Registered: 2007-06-04
Posts: 149
Website

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

If you want a high res bell for a Model III it will be from a Model II. The bore of the Model II is the one that will fit the bore of the Model III. The Model 201 and 101 are so called short bore bassoons and their bores are different than the Model III, which is a so called long bore. (To be honest, I prefer the term wide bore and narrow bore) Be prepared to spend about $1000.00 for the bell

Offline

 

#8 2008-07-03 23:44:48

ortreed
Member Associate
From: Indianapolis
Registered: 2005-02-05
Posts: 118

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

When I used to play a Fox 601, I tried different bells (including the new resonance bells) and the best I found was from an older 201 (not a resonance bell).   It was a little thinner wood, but it fit fine and  made the horn sing more.   

Mark


Mark Ortwein
Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra

Offline

 

#9 2010-02-06 23:37:26

minds_eye
Member
Registered: 2010-01-10
Posts: 22

Re: Fox Model III vs. Fox Renard 220

I know this is an old post, but Michael Dicker now plays on a newer red maple 601.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2008 PunBB